The Negative Connotation of ‘卷’ (Involution) in China anda Deeper Exploration

In contemporary China, the character “卷” (pronounced “juan”) has become a highly critical
term, especially in the context of internet culture. It vividly describes an intense competition
that leads to internal exhaustion and meaningless effort, while also reflecting people’s
helplessness and resentment toward social pressures and an unfair environment. If left
unchecked, this phenomenon of “involution” could spread to other regions, including Malaysia,
with negative implications for social and economic development. Therefore, it is essential to
delve deeply into the meaning and context of the term “卷.”

  1. The Literal and Extended Meanings of “卷”
    Literal Meaning
    In its original sense, “卷” means “to roll up or fold,” as seen in phrases like “卷书” (scrolls) or “卷
    轴” (rolls). In traditional contexts, the term carries no negative connotation and simply
    describes an action or form.
    Extended Contemporary Meaning
    In modern internet culture, “卷” is shorthand for “内卷” (involution), describing a social
    phenomenon where:
  • Intense competition forces participants to expend increasingly more resources or energy
    without yielding substantial benefits.
  • It also connotes over-competition, resource waste, and a collective societal anxiety.

2. The Origins and Essence of “Involution” The term “involution” (内卷) originates from sociology, referring to a system that, under limited
resources, fails to grow through innovation or external expansion and instead relies on
increasing internal inputs to maintain its status quo. Key features include:
Zero-Sum Game
Everyone contributes more, but the “pie” remains the same size, offering no improvement in
resource distribution.
Malicious Competition
Over-competition in areas like education, work, and life reduces people’s happiness and quality
of life. For example, Chinese parents spend enormous amounts on extracurricular tutoring to get
their children into prestigious schools, increasing overall education costs but not improving
admission rates.
Lack of Innovation
Participants are forced to follow established rules to survive, stifling creativity and
breakthroughs.

  1. Manifestations of “卷” in Society
    The “卷” Phenomenon in China
    In Education
  • Students face immense academic pressure starting in elementary school, with rampant
    after-school tutoring, anxious parents, and fierce grade competition.
  • College entrance exams (gaokao) become the ultimate goal, trapping families in a cycle
    of competing over time and energy.
    In the Workplace
  • Employees work longer hours to keep their jobs, leading to trends like “996” (9 AM to 9
    PM, six days a week) or “007” (midnight to midnight, seven days a week).
  • These extreme work schedules harm employee health and undermine corporate
    innovation.
    In Consumerism
  • “Keeping up with the Joneses” culture drives people to engage in meaningless
    materialistic competition, such as over-the-top social events or luxury consumption.

Potential Risks of “卷” in Malaysia
If Malaysia is not vigilant against similar involutionary trends, it may face challenges such as:
Over-Competition in Education
If Malaysian parents and students overly prioritize academic rankings at the expense of holistic
development and personal interests, it could lead to excessive stress and wasted educational
resources.

    Unhealthy Workplace Culture
    Companies that focus solely on output while ignoring employee well-being and creativity may
    face declining efficiency and rising turnover rates.
    Economic Imbalance
    In certain industries, if competition remains fixated on price wars or low-end manufacturing
    without transitioning to higher-value sectors, economic progress could stagnate.
    Social Anxiety and Mental Health Issues
    Involution fosters widespread societal anxiety, leading to rising mental health problems and
    lower overall happiness.

    1. Recommendations to Address “卷”
      For Individuals
      Clarify Goals: Learn to say no to meaningless competition and focus time and energy on
      genuinely valuable pursuits.
      Self-Development: Concentrate on personal growth instead of comparing yourself to others.
      Prioritize Mental Health: Accept diverse definitions of success and reduce pressures from
      society and family.
      For Society
      ☑ Promote Fair Competition: Establish transparent rules to avoid winner-takes-all situations.
      ☑ Cultivate Diversity: Encourage the development of arts, sports, and vocational education to
      reduce over-reliance on single academic goals.
      ☑ Protect Employee Rights: Enforce labor laws to balance work hours and employee welfare,
      avoiding workplace exhaustion.
      For the Government
      ☑ Optimize Resource Allocation: Invest more resources in education, healthcare, and
      technological innovation to reduce the intensity of foundational competition.
      ☑ Support Innovation Policies: Encourage businesses to break existing frameworks and pursue
      technological and managerial innovation.
      ☑ Build Mental Health Support Systems: Provide psychological services to help the public
      manage stress and anxiety.
    2. Conclusion: The Wisdom to Resolve “卷”
      The phenomenon of “卷” is not only a reflection of Chinese society but also a potential issue in
      any rapidly developing modern society. If Malaysia can recognize and prevent involution early, it
      can avoid falling into the trap of meaningless competition. By fostering innovation, optimizing
      resource allocation, and enhancing social equity, Malaysia can turn potential crises into growth
      opportunities.
      Malaysia’s future lies in balance: maintaining competitiveness without being suffocated by
      pointless competition. Achieving this balance requires a collective effort from society, the government, businesses, and individuals to create a more harmonious and healthy social
    3. environment.
    4. Written by Tan Sri Lee Kim Yew
    5. Reflections on the Signboard Controversy
    6. December 2, 2024